Roe v. Wade Overturned: How it Exposes Female Nature & What it Means
Roe v. Wade Overturned: How it Exposes Female Nature & What it Means



HonoredChain23
HonoredChain23
Go to original post
Sep 5, 2023
So as many of you may know, Roe v. Wade has been overturned by the US Supreme Court. For those who don't know what that is, it was a landmark case whereby abortion was determined to be Constitutional on the federal level, thereby allowing abortion across the entire United States. SCOTUS (Supreme Court of the United States) overturning it basically means they are saying it is not necessarily Constitutional. Please note that this does NOT mean it is therefore banned/outlawed across the US. It simply means the legality of abortion is now delegated to the states themselves. In other words, each of the individual states will determine whether it is legal or not for their own state.
Something to note is that most of the people you'll see who are vehemently against the overturning of Roe v. Wade are women. The reason for this is multifactorial. Firstly, most women are liberals. Liberals are in favor of abortion. As women conform to society, social pressure, and the general collective more strongly than men (I've talked about this previously), they're more affected by liberal ideological dogmas—which are currently the mainstream. Moreover, making judgements based on the collective feeling of a group—whether that be society, their friend group, the "vibe" they get in a social setting, or other—invariably means women are going to be more liberal because it caters to that type of emotionalism and morality policing they innately subscribe to.
Secondly, women in general cannot handle accountability. The removal of abortion simply means that their actions now have consequences, hence their fervor regarding the issue. I know it sounds sexist to say that, but it must be understood that women interpret reality based on how they feel about it, rather than interpret how they feel based on what's actually happening in reality. This is a perfect example of what I mean:

Judgements are made based on themselves. They feel they're a good person (because who wants to think they're a bad person, right?), and something made them feel bad. Because they're a good person, it means they didn't do anything wrong, and so the thing that made them feel bad, whatever it is, is therefore bad and should be eliminated. After all, anything that makes a good person feel bad is automatically in the wrong. This is the thought process of women. It is the reason why they tend to have more cognitive dissonance than men. Sigmund Freud even thought that only women have cognitive dissonance.
There's a lot of hypocrisy surrounding the issue as well. When it comes to abortion, they all scream from the rooftops "my body, my choice!" and that men shouldn't have a say in abortion. Yet when it comes to paying child support, women always say that it takes two to make a baby. This is an example of female duality that leads to the cognitive dissonance I mentioned earlier. That aside, I don't actually have a problem with the idea of child support. I'm simply against how it's weaponized against men. Men are oftentimes either forced to pay for children who aren't even theirs (see: paternity fraud), or are forced to pay exorbitant amounts that aren't even going to the children in the first place (cereal does not cost $5,000 per month smh).
I would also like to point out that contrary to what it may seem, I do not actually have a strong opinion on abortion outside of Islam. I am definitely more against it than not, but the abortion controversy is really just a symptom of the social rot that's been spreading throughout society, with people on both sides of the spectrum merely arguing on how to treat this symptom rather than eliminate the cause: While unwanted pregnancies aren't exactly favorable, abortion only prevents the consequences from happening; it doesn't act as a solution for the terrible choices that originally caused said consequences. On the other hand, however, being anti-abortion isn't solving the problem either because being pro-birth isn't exactly pro-life. There still is the issue of the lives these children will face after being born, along with the fact that most of the people who want abortions aren't the type of people who should be parents in the first place...
It's a complex issue. You have to ask why people seeking abortions want to get them, what caused them to think this way, why they were engaging in the poor actions & risky behavior that led to this, why they would rather choose to abort rather than attempt to work it out, etc. But to be honest, I think everyone already knows the answers to these questions. It's self-evident based on the general public atmosphere surrounding the debate, and even the broader social climate of the modern world today, and the statistics (1, 2) only confirm it:
Women have abortions due to their preference of self-gratification over personal responsibility.
And the reason for this is because they have no sense of personal responsibility. General trends in society and culture dictate it as such, rendering any fight against it a massive uphill battle. Like I said before, it's just another manifestation of the already-existing moral decay of Western civilization. We all intuitively know it and feel it, and when we take a step back and really think about it, we can see that right now, we are living in an era of social and moral decline.
So as many of you may know, Roe v. Wade has been overturned by the US Supreme Court. For those who don't know what that is, it was a landmark case whereby abortion was determined to be Constitutional on the federal level, thereby allowing abortion across the entire United States. SCOTUS (Supreme Court of the United States) overturning it basically means they are saying it is not necessarily Constitutional. Please note that this does NOT mean it is therefore banned/outlawed across the US. It simply means the legality of abortion is now delegated to the states themselves. In other words, each of the individual states will determine whether it is legal or not for their own state.
Something to note is that most of the people you'll see who are vehemently against the overturning of Roe v. Wade are women. The reason for this is multifactorial. Firstly, most women are liberals. Liberals are in favor of abortion. As women conform to society, social pressure, and the general collective more strongly than men (I've talked about this previously), they're more affected by liberal ideological dogmas—which are currently the mainstream. Moreover, making judgements based on the collective feeling of a group—whether that be society, their friend group, the "vibe" they get in a social setting, or other—invariably means women are going to be more liberal because it caters to that type of emotionalism and morality policing they innately subscribe to.
Secondly, women in general cannot handle accountability. The removal of abortion simply means that their actions now have consequences, hence their fervor regarding the issue. I know it sounds sexist to say that, but it must be understood that women interpret reality based on how they feel about it, rather than interpret how they feel based on what's actually happening in reality. This is a perfect example of what I mean:

Judgements are made based on themselves. They feel they're a good person (because who wants to think they're a bad person, right?), and something made them feel bad. Because they're a good person, it means they didn't do anything wrong, and so the thing that made them feel bad, whatever it is, is therefore bad and should be eliminated. After all, anything that makes a good person feel bad is automatically in the wrong. This is the thought process of women. It is the reason why they tend to have more cognitive dissonance than men. Sigmund Freud even thought that only women have cognitive dissonance.
There's a lot of hypocrisy surrounding the issue as well. When it comes to abortion, they all scream from the rooftops "my body, my choice!" and that men shouldn't have a say in abortion. Yet when it comes to paying child support, women always say that it takes two to make a baby. This is an example of female duality that leads to the cognitive dissonance I mentioned earlier. That aside, I don't actually have a problem with the idea of child support. I'm simply against how it's weaponized against men. Men are oftentimes either forced to pay for children who aren't even theirs (see: paternity fraud), or are forced to pay exorbitant amounts that aren't even going to the children in the first place (cereal does not cost $5,000 per month smh).
I would also like to point out that contrary to what it may seem, I do not actually have a strong opinion on abortion outside of Islam. I am definitely more against it than not, but the abortion controversy is really just a symptom of the social rot that's been spreading throughout society, with people on both sides of the spectrum merely arguing on how to treat this symptom rather than eliminate the cause: While unwanted pregnancies aren't exactly favorable, abortion only prevents the consequences from happening; it doesn't act as a solution for the terrible choices that originally caused said consequences. On the other hand, however, being anti-abortion isn't solving the problem either because being pro-birth isn't exactly pro-life. There still is the issue of the lives these children will face after being born, along with the fact that most of the people who want abortions aren't the type of people who should be parents in the first place...
It's a complex issue. You have to ask why people seeking abortions want to get them, what caused them to think this way, why they were engaging in the poor actions & risky behavior that led to this, why they would rather choose to abort rather than attempt to work it out, etc. But to be honest, I think everyone already knows the answers to these questions. It's self-evident based on the general public atmosphere surrounding the debate, and even the broader social climate of the modern world today, and the statistics (1, 2) only confirm it:
Women have abortions due to their preference of self-gratification over personal responsibility.
And the reason for this is because they have no sense of personal responsibility. General trends in society and culture dictate it as such, rendering any fight against it a massive uphill battle. Like I said before, it's just another manifestation of the already-existing moral decay of Western civilization. We all intuitively know it and feel it, and when we take a step back and really think about it, we can see that right now, we are living in an era of social and moral decline.
So as many of you may know, Roe v. Wade has been overturned by the US Supreme Court. For those who don't know what that is, it was a landmark case whereby abortion was determined to be Constitutional on the federal level, thereby allowing abortion across the entire United States. SCOTUS (Supreme Court of the United States) overturning it basically means they are saying it is not necessarily Constitutional. Please note that this does NOT mean it is therefore banned/outlawed across the US. It simply means the legality of abortion is now delegated to the states themselves. In other words, each of the individual states will determine whether it is legal or not for their own state.
Something to note is that most of the people you'll see who are vehemently against the overturning of Roe v. Wade are women. The reason for this is multifactorial. Firstly, most women are liberals. Liberals are in favor of abortion. As women conform to society, social pressure, and the general collective more strongly than men (I've talked about this previously), they're more affected by liberal ideological dogmas—which are currently the mainstream. Moreover, making judgements based on the collective feeling of a group—whether that be society, their friend group, the "vibe" they get in a social setting, or other—invariably means women are going to be more liberal because it caters to that type of emotionalism and morality policing they innately subscribe to.
Secondly, women in general cannot handle accountability. The removal of abortion simply means that their actions now have consequences, hence their fervor regarding the issue. I know it sounds sexist to say that, but it must be understood that women interpret reality based on how they feel about it, rather than interpret how they feel based on what's actually happening in reality. This is a perfect example of what I mean:

Judgements are made based on themselves. They feel they're a good person (because who wants to think they're a bad person, right?), and something made them feel bad. Because they're a good person, it means they didn't do anything wrong, and so the thing that made them feel bad, whatever it is, is therefore bad and should be eliminated. After all, anything that makes a good person feel bad is automatically in the wrong. This is the thought process of women. It is the reason why they tend to have more cognitive dissonance than men. Sigmund Freud even thought that only women have cognitive dissonance.
There's a lot of hypocrisy surrounding the issue as well. When it comes to abortion, they all scream from the rooftops "my body, my choice!" and that men shouldn't have a say in abortion. Yet when it comes to paying child support, women always say that it takes two to make a baby. This is an example of female duality that leads to the cognitive dissonance I mentioned earlier. That aside, I don't actually have a problem with the idea of child support. I'm simply against how it's weaponized against men. Men are oftentimes either forced to pay for children who aren't even theirs (see: paternity fraud), or are forced to pay exorbitant amounts that aren't even going to the children in the first place (cereal does not cost $5,000 per month smh).
I would also like to point out that contrary to what it may seem, I do not actually have a strong opinion on abortion outside of Islam. I am definitely more against it than not, but the abortion controversy is really just a symptom of the social rot that's been spreading throughout society, with people on both sides of the spectrum merely arguing on how to treat this symptom rather than eliminate the cause: While unwanted pregnancies aren't exactly favorable, abortion only prevents the consequences from happening; it doesn't act as a solution for the terrible choices that originally caused said consequences. On the other hand, however, being anti-abortion isn't solving the problem either because being pro-birth isn't exactly pro-life. There still is the issue of the lives these children will face after being born, along with the fact that most of the people who want abortions aren't the type of people who should be parents in the first place...
It's a complex issue. You have to ask why people seeking abortions want to get them, what caused them to think this way, why they were engaging in the poor actions & risky behavior that led to this, why they would rather choose to abort rather than attempt to work it out, etc. But to be honest, I think everyone already knows the answers to these questions. It's self-evident based on the general public atmosphere surrounding the debate, and even the broader social climate of the modern world today, and the statistics (1, 2) only confirm it:
Women have abortions due to their preference of self-gratification over personal responsibility.
And the reason for this is because they have no sense of personal responsibility. General trends in society and culture dictate it as such, rendering any fight against it a massive uphill battle. Like I said before, it's just another manifestation of the already-existing moral decay of Western civilization. We all intuitively know it and feel it, and when we take a step back and really think about it, we can see that right now, we are living in an era of social and moral decline.